Author Topic: Possible activity discussion.  (Read 48729 times)

Offline surt

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 367
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Meat by-product
    • View Profile
    • Uninhabitant
Re: Possible activity discussion.
« Reply #130 on: November 18, 2011, 10:04:13 am »
Added despeckle: remove single pixels by removing the pixel or adding a neighbour (parameters: despeckle [off, remove, extend, random], despeckleProb); and despur: remove pixels with single neighbour (parameters: despup [off, on, random], despurProb). eg. http://tools.putpixel.com/spritegen.html?despeckle=remove&despeckleProb=1&despur=on&despurProb=1&size=24&zoom=2, http://tools.putpixel.com/spritegen.html?despeckle=remove&despeckleProb=1&despur=on&despurProb=1&size=12&zoom=2
« Last Edit: November 18, 2011, 10:44:38 am by surt »

Offline Mathias

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 1662
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • animation is magic
    • View Profile
Re: Possible activity discussion.
« Reply #131 on: November 28, 2011, 05:16:22 am »
Wow, great job, Surt! I see so many "recognizable" things in the results. Very cool.

But, how do you change the parameters? Manually change the booleans in the URL?

Is an interface with buttons very far off?
« Last Edit: November 28, 2011, 05:21:05 am by Mathias »

Offline surt

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 367
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Meat by-product
    • View Profile
    • Uninhabitant
Re: Possible activity discussion.
« Reply #132 on: November 29, 2011, 01:57:01 am »
Added a quick and dirty GUI. Ugly, no validation and basically untested.
« Last Edit: November 29, 2011, 02:16:03 am by surt »

Offline Mathias

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 1662
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • animation is magic
    • View Profile
Re: Possible activity discussion.
« Reply #133 on: November 29, 2011, 04:32:49 am »
Nice!

Just some things to help:

-Tilesize max cap. It didn't my input value of 465348754367.

-Reset to defaults button. I messed the settings all up and got useless results. Wanted to revert.

-Zoom shouldn't accept 0, everything just disappears.


Offline Atnas

  • Moderator
  • 0011
  • *
  • Posts: 766
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • very daijōbs
    • View Profile
    • lolipopsicle
Re: Possible activity discussion.
« Reply #134 on: November 29, 2011, 02:02:51 pm »
very very nice. This image has countless great designs in it:



I think the original was good for fine tuning and finding variations on a certain design, but this one just outputs some crazy nice stuff all around.

Offline big brother

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 330
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • http://www.ifs-art.com
    • View Profile
    • Portfolio Site
Re: Possible activity discussion.
« Reply #135 on: November 30, 2011, 01:03:50 am »
I see a lot of character/monster design potential in that sheet.

Offline surt

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 367
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Meat by-product
    • View Profile
    • Uninhabitant
Re: Possible activity discussion.
« Reply #136 on: December 01, 2011, 01:18:38 am »
Added load and submit validation, reset, colour pickers (jscolor). Also changed some of the properties a little. Lots of behind the scenes refactoring so probably some bugs.
Colour pickers don't like my layout css in Firefox, so if any CSS guru could suggest an alternative to get the canvas and form to sit next to each other while remaining auto width would be cool.

Offline Redshrike

  • 0001
  • *
  • Posts: 91
  • Karma: +0/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Possible activity discussion.
« Reply #137 on: December 01, 2011, 03:13:54 am »
Hmm...  I'm not getting nearly the results I was with the last version, and my brief tweaking of the settings doesn't seem to have gotten me much closer.  I'm also finding the settings a bit hard to understand apart from trial/error, though that's probably my lack of programmerly background showing.

Offline Atnas

  • Moderator
  • 0011
  • *
  • Posts: 766
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • very daijōbs
    • View Profile
    • lolipopsicle
Re: Possible activity discussion.
« Reply #138 on: December 01, 2011, 03:25:24 am »
yeah I agree the image I posted earlier was done with 1 tweak and now I can't seem to replicate it, perhaps set the defaults to how they were before if possible? because I had hit a sweet spot.

Also, 1x zoom by default would be nice if anyone else also feels that's better. Chrome users will love you for it.

Offline surt

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 367
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Meat by-product
    • View Profile
    • Uninhabitant
Re: Possible activity discussion.
« Reply #139 on: December 01, 2011, 05:28:19 am »
Tweaked the defaults to hopefully produce better results.
I won't pander to a browser's shitty design choices. You can set zoom to 1 then bookmark it.